The hard truth is - some of these policy makers are designing formulas as they go along.
On the horizon is the newest and more "improved" teacher accountability - The Common Core.
If you are a teacher who happens to be nervous beyond belief, allow me to calm your fears. There are two main components to PASSING:
1. You must make a 3 or 4 on your formal observation (Your state may use a variety of coding)
2. You must make certain that your students perform "Good" or "Excellent."
Now, this is the easy part - this can be done with very little "shifts."
For example, all states have standardized testing resource materials. These materials have SAMPLE questions. What throws students off a great deal is that the real test "feels" so much different than the sample exercises. When you review the questions and answers with your students, create a method by which you can assess if they understand why the wrong answers are wrong. (see chart below)
It's very easy to review correct answers. But, what happens when the test makers create narratives which contain why the wrong answers are incorrect and the question turns into one of those "except" babies? Your students are doomed if they are not prepared for the switch.
If you use this method, I can guarantee you an increase in test scores. To make the process a more meaningful one, allow the students to write short responses to how they arrived at the answer.
Here's what you will discover:
1. Points of common confusion.
2. Points of common strengths.
3. How well you're making an impact.
This knowledge will make you a more effective teacher. Allow the students to LEAD the discussion, to correct common errors in thinking, and to create an envirnoment where they feel comfortable asking questions.
The basis of how questions are designed in this new era of testing is to test students on how well they can work through similations involving
* cooperative (team) groups who work to solve problems
* formulating the "root" question to a real life challenge
* making choices based on concrete evidence
You can BEAT this evaluation process with simple changes that have a huge impact on student achievement.
For more advice or personal professional development sessions, contact me at calltoteach1@yahoo.com.
Subject line: Help! Common Core
Question
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ = my
choice X = totally erroneous information
NS = unrelated
information/makes no sense
IF = Incorrect
formula/math is incorrect UT
= untrue/no evidence IDK
= I don't know/no clues
Sample:
What is the chemical formula for
iron (III) oxide?
|
|
A.
|
Fe2+
|
B.
|
NaCl
|
C.
|
I2
|
D.
|
Fe2O3
|
Your student responses should look like:
Question
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
1
|
X
|
NS
|
NS
|
√
|
|
If you take the time to explore this method, your students’
scores will increase.You may design your own symbols. But, the process is the same. This process works for any subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment